[I started with a brief mention of name mentioned in the question.]
If you have another look at the guidelines
you will see they say:
Information on your sources of information can be very relevant. There is much erroneous speculation on the internet, particularly relating to early settlers in America, and it helps to know whether the foundations of your question are solid. (See The Myth of Stanstead Abbey if you want evidence.)
The reason for saying this is that UK
genealogists regularly get queries from the U.S.A. which say -
without quoting sources - that they
know their UK ancestor came from a particular place at a
particular date. In many cases it turns out they have never even looked at an
original handwritten document of the period (or a suitable digital image). The
information they have has merely been copied from a family tree produced
(without quoting sources) by someone else. In many cases it would seem that the
tree had been copied again and again. The original printed tree was probably produced 100 years or more ago, when modern computer indexes were not available, and research was very much harder (and expensive) to do properly. What was originally a best guess or a downright error
is now considered to be TRUE because the original
guess/error has been repeated on hundreds of web site by people who knew so
little about proper genealogy that they didn't know the importance of checking and
quoting sources.
I don't know if this applies to you but in your case there are regular queries about William and I know that they have been looked at in detail by an experienced family historian who has drawn a blank. You might well be advised to accept
that you are unlikely to be able to trace the paternal line any further back.
with any degree of confidence.
Be realistic. All genealogy investigations
are bound to end with a complete block at some stage - some people who are
adopted may not even know the identity of their own parents, while a vary large
number of people can link into the nobility (where there are many published
trees - not all accurate), and hence into the well documented royalty of Europe
- so that there must be many millions that have a family tree in which at least
one line could be traced back to Charlemagne.
I can see hoiw that would be annoying, it must be difficult to trace things at the best of times
ReplyDelete